> you're supposing that a woman in swimwear at a beach is giving implied consent for her image to be used in a radically different context. Are you suggeting h

> you're supposing that a woman in swimwear at a beach is giving implied consent for her image to be used in a radically different context. Are you suggeting he used the image of his wife without her consent? That would indeed be inappropriate, but the article does not seem to support this accusation. The quote from her imply she is fine with it: > "The beauty of the internet is that people can take things, and do what they want with them, to project what they want or feel," she says.