They took on immense risk in order to squeeze all the profit they could out of the system.... but faced no consequences as a result of losing on their bets. $45

They took on immense risk in order to squeeze all the profit they could out of the system.... but faced no consequences as a result of losing on their bets. $45 billion in two installments kept them afloat. Wouldn't a anarcho-capitalist demand that a market loser like Citi pay the price?