>>The solution is either correct or incorrect. Not even humans write 100% correct solutions. Everyday programming is not a theorem proving exercise. Programs a

>>The solution is either correct or incorrect. Not even humans write 100% correct solutions. Everyday programming is not a theorem proving exercise. Programs are correct enough, to cover a agreeable amount of test cases. >>Anytime I ask it to generate a series of classes Generating a class is too big and broad of question to ask an LLM to generate. My chunks of inputs and outputs to/from an LLM are often on the lines of a single for loop, if block or a small chunk of code that can't be written in more than one way. There are several steps from here to a complete class. LLM is your classic socratic thinking tool. You really to have to learn to ask and work in chunks of questions that are smallest, and involve only one change from the previous question, and are atomic enough to do a easy roll back. And you need to build from here. As experience with the series of books The Little Schemer shows, this unfortunately is not everyone's cup of tea. A lot of people struggle to keep a train of thought in their minds and work in that workflow. To that extent I see LLM are not for everyone. Just like how Google search was great and helped a lot of people, but the majority just couldn't bring themselves to sit in front of a screen and work for hours stitching solutions from various places on internet into a working solution.