6 ms·
> Technically the article never says the dot is related to the arrest, but it's certainly implied. Given the last sentence of the article is "The prosecutor’s
by parhamn 2y ago
> Technically the article never says the dot is related to the arrest, but it's certainly implied.
Given the last sentence of the article is "The prosecutor’s office in Ardabil alleged that Shanbehzadeh had been in contact with Israeli intelligence officers and was arrested when trying to leave the country, according to Voice of America." it's not even implied.
- boomboomsubban 2y agoIt seems implied. Anybody only reading the headline or not giving it a thorough enough reading would probably think the dot is relevant to the sentencing. Even carefully reading it, the dot takes up significantly more of the article than what Iran claim the charges were.
- parhamn 2y agoSorry I misread, I meant that the article itself points to the fact that theres more to the charge than the "dot", the just, oddly, happen to mention it on the last line.