The article's premise that Biden's departure was an "ouster" or "dethroning" (in the usual sense) is plainly false, of course. This choice of misleading and hy

The article's premise that Biden's departure was an "ouster" or "dethroning" (in the usual sense) is plainly false, of course. This choice of misleading and hyperbolic language, right off the bat, doesn't bode well for whatever message the rest of the article might have. And then we have this: A Harris victory would likely trigger civil disorder of a kind more protracted and more lethal than the riots seen in Britain recently. The article isn't about anything, really. It's just doomerist blather.