4 ms·
Objectively, original post had little to no details in it to link it to any kind of typology. Sidenote: the fact that someone came up with another typology or
by smugglerFlynn 2y ago
Objectively, original post had little to no details in it to link it to any kind of typology.
Sidenote: the fact that someone came up with another typology or classificator does not mean they know how to predict the outcomes in any way. It is the same exact MBTI style of pseudo-science which polluted tech and business world for decades. For someone urging others to read more, you’ve surely read something about the hindsight bias?[0]
0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindsight_bias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindsight_bias
- regularfry 2y agoHow fascinatingly hostile. > Objectively, original post had little to no details in it to link it to any kind of typology. And nobody suggested that it did. > predict the outcomes in any way. And nobody suggested that it did. > MBTI > pseudo-science > hindsight bias Ok, you do you.