Indeed, we should actually have a CEO take all of the surplus value. Or at least a continuously increasing amount. Not based on their performance or the value

Indeed, we should actually have a CEO take all of the surplus value. Or at least a continuously increasing amount. Not based on their performance or the value they can be measured to add, nor comparing against any sort of alternative structure that might be more efficient, but simply because they deserve it for their hard work ensuring the company is operational and ever-growing. Indeed, really it should be the case among all companies. And if employees dislike it, they should simply try to employ themselves and join in on the action; so often are people simply lazy whiners who should go make their own profitable business before rent's due. Actually, in retrospect, the CEOs should probably leave some surplus for the landlords to share -- without their herculean work, how would so many have a home to live in?