2 ms·
>>because of its length, it had a lot of leverage on the board, requiring fairly heavy-duty soldering to avoid damaging the board. Strawman? I doubt many peop
by catlikesshrimp 2y ago
>>because of its length, it had a lot of leverage on the board, requiring fairly heavy-duty soldering to avoid damaging the board.
Strawman?
I doubt many people even thought about it. For them, bluetooth was available. Now it is almost the only option.
- pdoege 2y agoZ stack strength and rigidity is a huge driver because it reduces charge back. Margins are super tight for a lot of OEMs and the PMs eliminate any non-profit features. Off the top of my head, there are savings in: Pick and place Stack Assembly Testing Improved phones/hour and therefore shorter/cheaper factory runs Packaging, especially if you eliminate the shitty wired earpieces in the box Less weight/volume and cheaper shipping Reduced warranty / chargeback because things that don’t exist can’t fail All of these savings are small. But remember that the goal is to make/sell 500K+ units. And, this is an industry where the bean counters will kill their mothers to shave a penny off of the BOM. So, yeah, for the OEM eliminating headphone jacks is a complete no brainer.
- catlikesshrimp 2y agoEverything you said is true. But the cheapest phones still have the 3.5mm jack. People on a budget use wired earphones because they are harder to lose, price and even fashion (color n stuff) Flagship phones on the other hand are sold to another population who seems happy to spend more money for a small inconvenience.