I’m afraid the whole piece is missing a framework like yours. It looks very selectively at one successful category of enterprises and then generalizes this ont

I’m afraid the whole piece is missing a framework like yours. It looks very selectively at one successful category of enterprises and then generalizes this onto all. But: What about all those founder mode companies that went terribly wrong? What about all the companies that function well in “non-founder” mode? Apple today is a perfect example. I don’t think it’s about founder/non-founder either but about some underlying fundamental principles that PG hasn’t figured out yet.