3 ms·

This is not my claim.

• pjmlp 2y ago
  It actually is, as it is voiced in a way as if preprocessor was better than using templates.
  • sixfiveotwo 2y ago
    You'll have to quote me, I don't see where I am implying that. But anyway, the point that I am refuting is the use of C++ to write programs for such an extremely constrained runtime environnement, and at the same time refuse to use this library (which is template based afaik).
    • pjmlp 2y ago
      "Template specialization means more generated code, which, again, must fit in 2kb." Have fun, "Rich Code for Tiny Computers: A Simple Commodore 64 Game in C++17" https://youtu.be/zBkNBP00wJE?si=im0ga3rW08mR8g8f https://youtu.be/zBkNBP00wJE?si=im0ga3rW08mR8g8f
      • sixfiveotwo 2y ago
        That quote does not imply anything about C macro being better in any way, but I am nevertheless delighted that you could prove me wrong somehow. Thank you for this!