4 ms·
But.. isn't true that some Intel SSD Hardware Encryption is not (known to be) broken so far (unlike Samsung, WD, Crucial etc.)? ( https://www.tomshardware.com/
by thro1 2y ago
But.. isn't true that some Intel SSD Hardware Encryption is not (known to be) broken so far (unlike Samsung, WD, Crucial etc.)?
( https://www.tomshardware.com/news/crucial-samsung-ssd-encryption-bypassed,38025.html https://www.tomshardware.com/news/crucial-samsung-ssd-encryp... https://community.wd.com/t/what-do-you-think-of-the-security-flaws-in-the-western-digital-security-encryption-on-our-harddrives/172354 https://community.wd.com/t/what-do-you-think-of-the-security... https://www.zdnet.com/article/flaws-in-self-encrypting-ssds-let-attackers-bypass-disk-encryption/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/flaws-in-self-encrypting-ssds-... https://techreport.com/news/256-bit-aes-encryption-broken-in-sandforce-ssd-controllers/ https://techreport.com/news/256-bit-aes-encryption-broken-in... https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/134564/how-secure-is-hardware-full-disk-encryption-fde-for-ssds https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/134564/how-secu... and some Defcon(?) files I can't find now - no success with Intel ? )
- BodyCulture 2y agoHave you been able to do a review of the code? If yes: please share. If not: why not? Thanks!
- thro1 2y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18385507 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18385507 ?
- fsflover 2y agohttps://www.kicksecure.com/wiki/Malware_and_Firmware_Trojans#Backdoors https://www.kicksecure.com/wiki/Malware_and_Firmware_Trojans...
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- thro1 2y ago(THAT, cite of tptacek, fulfilling someone's request, downvoted - with.. such empty*, hypothetical argument ?? - so far it's a libel - at least make some effort to proof otherwise in that case Mr FSFdiscreditor.. *"easier to hide backdoors" - so you don't need source to check the _real_ code - only more effort) - vs attack surface ? (having no reasons for powerful adversaries)