3 ms·
Discussing performance only makes sense in the context of a particular awk implementation, like TFA is doing as well. If you‘re (stuck) on gawk, try setting LAN
by tannhaeuser 2y ago
Discussing performance only makes sense in the context of a particular awk implementation, like TFA is doing as well. If you‘re (stuck) on gawk, try setting LANG=C to prevent Unicode/multi-byte regexp execution, or switch to mawk (which according to [1] is much faster than cpython).
[1]: https://brenocon.com/blog/2009/09/dont-mawk-awk-the-fastest-and-most-elegant-big-data-munging-language/ https://brenocon.com/blog/2009/09/dont-mawk-awk-the-fastest-...
- actuallyalys 2y agoHonestly only makes sense in the context of a Python library and implementation as well, since so many libraries use C extensions in order to speed up processing. Also, Python has gotten a lot faster over time.
- v3ss0n 2y agoWe gotta compare against pypy,or cpython plus pandas then