4 ms·
I've just successfully chatted to ChatGPT about equivalence or at least high similarities between QFT, neural networks and cellular automata (referencing Wofram
by golergka 2y ago
I've just successfully chatted to ChatGPT about equivalence or at least high similarities between QFT, neural networks and cellular automata (referencing Wofram's work). Does that pattern matching count?
- Vampiero 2y agoNo but GPT is really good at fooling laymen who are not experts of a field, and it stands to reason that it just fed you a bunch of bs
- xwolfi 2y agoAnd you were able to verify, of course, that anything new or surprising to you (as in, not a simple derivation of your own prompts), was true ? I noticed that if I ask it to tell me how good cryptocurrencies are, it'll do it, and then if I say I disagree and they're wrong, it'll simply switch and agree with me as well. The thing has no care for truth, no opinion of its own, no ability to insist, and just feeds you whatever is statistically close to your own questions.