>We don’t have the right to tell people if they can’t do drugs. It’s a crime without a victim. I don't know about others, but I see points like this and it fai

>We don’t have the right to tell people if they can’t do drugs. It’s a crime without a victim. I don't know about others, but I see points like this and it fairly comprehensively invalidates any other points an entity/organisation/etc makes. Society absolutely can tell people what what's acceptable and what's not. That's almost the definition of a society. Also it's very much not victimless. Look at the families and especially kids of addicts. The drain on a govts resources (policing/healthcare). On others in society too (drug related violence, car accidents, etc). Different drugs should be treated differently (weed vs meth, etc) I do believe.