15 ms·
Including providing free social networking for everyone on the whole planet? (Not that I'm a fan of Facebook, and many of their practices are questionable. But
by nvch 2y ago
Including providing free social networking for everyone on the whole planet?
(Not that I'm a fan of Facebook, and many of their practices are questionable. But if we want to think in a less biased way, it's not correct to leave out the part of the equation where they also do good. We may find that it's nowhere near the bottom of the humanitarian scale.)
- pluto_modadic 2y agoon facebook you are the product, though. If facebook were mastodon, and also didn't have ads, maybe.
- thrance 2y agoIf anything, this planet would be a better place if we could get rid of Facebook.
- neverartful 2y agoWouldn't the bulk of the activity just find somewhere else to do mostly the same stuff they were doing on Facebook?
- timeon 2y agoThe polarization of society may show that social media are net negative.
- lm28469 2y agoAh yes, the famous "everything new is progress and progress is good". I wish I had such simple views on the world
- yread 2y agoI think that the vast majority of the power usage is actually spent on crunching the data for advertisers so a social network with no need for monetization could be a lot more energy efficient
- yccs27 2y agoThe better part of Facebook's network traffic is there to serve ads. A utilitarian social network (similar to this site) would probably only use a fraction of the resources.
- mike_hearn 2y agoGiven that most of their AI hardware was bought for better feed ranking, probably not unless you reduce the entire company to nothing but "serving ads".