3 ms·
Physiological responses, the kind relayed from major body organs to the brain via the vagus nerve, are not necessarily your “mind” in the sense that they contri
by nis0s 2y ago
Physiological responses, the kind relayed from major body organs to the brain via the vagus nerve, are not necessarily your “mind” in the sense that they contribute towards your conscious actions or self-directed goals. But yeah, they send signals which can be interpreted one way vs. another depending on if you’re being mindful.
Arousal is especially interesting because you can compress a nerve in the right way and experience something you don’t actually feel or want to feel. Feelings, however, are not the “mind”, i.e. the self-directed, persistent and conscious entity.
I think it’s important to say this because people often fall into the trap of thinking physiological responses are indicative of consciousness.
Another cool thing about the vagus nerve is what happens when people get vagotomy (from Wikipedia)
> Researchers from Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital have demonstrated that vagotomy prevents (halves the risk of) the development of Parkinson's disease, suggesting that Parkinson's disease begins in the gastrointestinal tract and spreads via the vagus nerve to the brain.[24] Or giving further evidence to the theory that dysregulated environmental stimuli, such as that received by the vagus nerve from the gut, may have a negative effect on the dopamine reward system of the substantia nigra, thereby causing Parkinson's disease
- fredgrott 2y agoits even more complicated than that... -Parkinson's has lower amount of GI lining -Parkinson's is a severe lowering of dopamine...how severe...patients take 1800mg dopamine daily.... Almost kissing cousin to ADHD....
- teuobk 2y agoUnfortunately, that link between vagotomy and reduced risk of PD hasn't been supported by subsequent studies. In fact, it wasn't really even supported by the initial study[1]: although the point estimates of the hazard ratios were below 1.0, the confidence intervals did not exclude 1.0 -- or stated differently, at p<0.05, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected. [1] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ana.24448 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ana.24448
- nis0s 2y agoCool, interesting! Though I wouldn’t be surprised if there are such links, even if this one is not supported by further research. We know that gingivitis can lead to heart disease, so I wouldn’t be surprised to find that gut microbial imbalance could have other implications.