Finally read the article. Seems that the author is really trying to spark a controversy more than anything. Its not a strong use of science or stats. The rever

Finally read the article. Seems that the author is really trying to spark a controversy more than anything. Its not a strong use of science or stats. The reversal of comparing breastfeeding against other means is the incorrect process of evaluating the options. Breastfeeding is the incumbent option, evolved in mammals millions of years ago... any replacement option should be the thing proving some scientific superiority. This is like trying to prove legs aren't as good as a wheel chair for moving people around.