3 ms·
> Yes, if the government punishes "The press" for its speech That wasn't the case, the case was "the press" covering criminals. Being the press don't give a co
by meiraleal 2y ago
> Yes, if the government punishes "The press" for its speech
That wasn't the case, the case was "the press" covering criminals. Being the press don't give a company free pass to commit crimes and Xitter is paying for that.
PS: "1st amendment" is an American term that doesn't mean anything outside of american jurisdiction (and maybe not even inside, see Tiktok).
- stale2002 2y ago> That wasn't the case, the case was "the press" covering criminals. If the government makes it illegal to publish certain things, that would mean that it is both a crime and censorship. So yes, that would be the case and my previous statement applies. The government making it illegal for the press to publish certain things is definitionally what censorship is. There is literally no more clear example of what censorship is than that.