4 ms·
The source is that you look at the files yourself from GitHub or the Intercept, which are available to anyone.
by throw10920 2y ago
The source is that you look at the files yourself from GitHub or the Intercept, which are available to anyone.
- aguaviva 2y agoNo one has time to chase down vague and hand-wavy "references" like these. If you don't want to provide a constructive response to what was asked, that's your prerogative of course.
- throw10920 2y agoIt's a blatant lie to call this a "vague and hand-wavey reference". The files are publicly available on the Intercept and the first page on Google search results - there is absolutely no vagueness here. It's also a blatant lie to claim that "no one has time" to spend 10 seconds on a Google search to find the files and 5-10 minutes to sample them and see how many are related to domestic collection. Your response clearly indicates that you have neither read the files nor have the intellectual honesty to admit that you haven't read them and don't want to because it'll refute your existing beliefs. Future HN readers: notice how this user is unwilling to read documents that are the first page on a Google search for "Snowden files", and uses any excuse necessary to avoid doing so and deflect when called out. This is an excellent confirmation of my claim that the majority of the documents are unrelated to domestic collection.