4 ms·
It's sad that this information is behind a paywall. Not as a fault of the New York Times, they deserve money for this work. It's sad that the default freely av
by gmd63 2y ago
It's sad that this information is behind a paywall. Not as a fault of the New York Times, they deserve money for this work.
It's sad that the default freely available information spread around is that the chain of hospitals is a professional institution that's endorsed by the board of medicine. And knowing the truth costs money. Just as bringing these folks to justice costs money.
- gpvos 2y agoIt's a general problem: the good information is behind paywalls, so people only find bad information and start believing nonsense.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- watwut 2y agoTo be fair, the journalism was not historically free service. There was brief period where they tried to live by ads and use free articles to make people buy paper, but it did not worked.