The only mention I see in the article that he will be using the plane to commute is in an annotation: > For his commute, he'll be covering the 1,600km each way

The only mention I see in the article that he will be using the plane to commute is in an annotation: > For his commute, he'll be covering the 1,600km each way via corporate jet. No mention of how often he'll make that trip. One might read the requirement of "in the office three days each week" and infer these would be weekly trips, but there's no support given for this inference in TFA. ...which gives the article a distinct air of outrage chum. Instead of reporting on what someone is doing, it is trying to stir up resentment about what someone might do, based on their employment contract?