3 ms·

Ask HN: Where do you subscribe to published journal topics?

Hey all trying to track all published journals. Is there something like a place or rss for all published journals? thank you!

mikewarot 2y ago
Ok, this might be a different interpretation of the word journal than you intend? I follow various people and organizations on Twitter and YouTube, and do everything I can to avoid the algorithm, keeping things curated. I don't subscribe to anything on dead trees anymore.
- hhthrowaway1230 2y ago
  Ok thank you
Yawrehto 2y ago
If you mean articles: No, it would be unfeasible. According to Science [https://www.science.org/content/article/scienceadviser-scientists-are-publishing-too-many-papers-and-s-bad-science https://www.science.org/content/article/scienceadviser-scien...] there are about 2.82 million articles coming out every year. That's 5.3 papers every minute, 24/7. If you mean a list of titles, your best bet would probably be something like https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ [PMC, life sciences/medicine], https://www.jstor.org/ https://www.jstor.org/ [JSTOR, general], https://scholar.google.com https://scholar.google.com [general], https://scholar.archive.org/ https://scholar.archive.org/ [from the Internet Archive; I haven't used it much, but it could be helpful if the journal is now defunct]. There are others, like the ones on this list [https://blog.scholasticahq.com/post/index-types-for-academic-journal/ https://blog.scholasticahq.com/post/index-types-for-academic...]. I'm not sure how much overlap there is between those. Of course, you could always try SciDB, a continuation of SciHub, hosted at Anna's Archive. I would think there aren't legal concerns if you're just looking at the title, but I am Not A Lawyer.
- hhthrowaway1230 2y ago
  If a human parses 5.2 papers a minute thats unfeasible but for a piece of software it wouldn't.
  - Yawrehto 2y ago
    I was picturing it as a sort of 'Here's a new paper' feed, but obviously if you're getting 5.2 notifications per minute even the interesting stuff will get drowned out. Am I envisioning this wrong?
deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
jszymborski 2y ago
OpenAlex[0] and CrossRef[1] is a pretty good source for this. [0] https://openalex.org/ https://openalex.org/ [1] https://www.crossref.org/ https://www.crossref.org/
- hhthrowaway1230 2y ago
  Thank you this is very valuable!
cossatot 2y ago
I don’t know if this is compatible with your use case, but as a working scientist interested in my sub field and those adjacent, I subscribe to email alerts from publishers (all nonprofit scientific societies with the exception of Nature). There are both table of contents emails and keyword-based emails. Not sure if RSS feeds are available. If you’re wanting to do some automated parsing, you might need a dedicated email address (and of course access through a university library or similar).
- hhthrowaway1230 2y ago
  This is the way I went, thank you <3

Hey all trying to track all published journals. Is there something like a place or rss for all published journals? thank you!

mikewarot 2y ago

Ok, this might be a different interpretation of the word journal than you intend? I follow various people and organizations on Twitter and YouTube, and do everything I can to avoid the algorithm, keeping things curated. I don't subscribe to anything on dead trees anymore.

hhthrowaway1230 2y ago
Ok thank you

Yawrehto 2y ago

If you mean articles: No, it would be unfeasible. According to Science [https://www.science.org/content/article/scienceadviser-scientists-are-publishing-too-many-papers-and-s-bad-science https://www.science.org/content/article/scienceadviser-scien...] there are about 2.82 million articles coming out every year. That's 5.3 papers every minute, 24/7. If you mean a list of titles, your best bet would probably be something like https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ [PMC, life sciences/medicine], https://www.jstor.org/ https://www.jstor.org/ [JSTOR, general], https://scholar.google.com https://scholar.google.com [general], https://scholar.archive.org/ https://scholar.archive.org/ [from the Internet Archive; I haven't used it much, but it could be helpful if the journal is now defunct]. There are others, like the ones on this list [https://blog.scholasticahq.com/post/index-types-for-academic-journal/ https://blog.scholasticahq.com/post/index-types-for-academic...]. I'm not sure how much overlap there is between those. Of course, you could always try SciDB, a continuation of SciHub, hosted at Anna's Archive. I would think there aren't legal concerns if you're just looking at the title, but I am Not A Lawyer.

hhthrowaway1230 2y ago
If a human parses 5.2 papers a minute thats unfeasible but for a piece of software it wouldn't.
- Yawrehto 2y ago
  I was picturing it as a sort of 'Here's a new paper' feed, but obviously if you're getting 5.2 notifications per minute even the interesting stuff will get drowned out. Am I envisioning this wrong?

deleted 2y ago

[deleted]

jszymborski 2y ago

OpenAlex[0] and CrossRef[1] is a pretty good source for this. [0] https://openalex.org/ https://openalex.org/ [1] https://www.crossref.org/ https://www.crossref.org/

hhthrowaway1230 2y ago
Thank you this is very valuable!

cossatot 2y ago

I don’t know if this is compatible with your use case, but as a working scientist interested in my sub field and those adjacent, I subscribe to email alerts from publishers (all nonprofit scientific societies with the exception of Nature). There are both table of contents emails and keyword-based emails. Not sure if RSS feeds are available. If you’re wanting to do some automated parsing, you might need a dedicated email address (and of course access through a university library or similar).

hhthrowaway1230 2y ago
This is the way I went, thank you <3