3 ms·
I like Bluesky, its devs, and its tech. I even built a third-party web client for it in Solid.js. But I find Bluesky to be too toxic. There's too much unwanted
by seanvelasco 2y ago
I like Bluesky, its devs, and its tech. I even built a third-party web client for it in Solid.js. But I find Bluesky to be too toxic. There's too much unwanted nudity, even if all my filters are turned on.
- _heimdall 2y agoThat's really the core of the social media problem though. Social platforms are asked to, and signing themselves up to, walk the fine line between free speech and content moderation. Ultimately they are private platforms and as far as I'm concerned they can censor as much or as little as they want, but its a fundamental problem of any algorithmically managed feed of user generated content. There's no easy fix there and you'll always piss of a large chunk of the population.
- sumeno 2y agoI have never seen any nudity on bsky and I've been using it for more than a year
- newZWhoDis 2y agoNow this is how you do guerrilla marketing.
- Maken 2y agoReally? I need to investigate that further.
- jazzyjackson 2y agoI wonder if anyone's doing intersections and differences on feeds yet - would be awesome if there were people aggregating all the only fans accounts so I could just subtract that from my algorithmic feed.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]