3 ms·
I don’t think he’s suggesting we can teach how to be a good founder in general. Just that we can study and then teach the difference between managing a team as
by namenotrequired 2y ago
I don’t think he’s suggesting we can teach how to be a good founder in general. Just that we can study and then teach the difference between managing a team as a founder vs general management practices
- theGnuMe 2y agoThere's also the concept that companies that succeed, succeed despite themselves. You have catch the wave; otherwise you do a lot of paddling.
- detourdog 2y agoI'm sort of a believer in that. Since it prioritizes being lucky.
- detourdog 2y agoI could sort of see that but that is almost too much common sense. Be a supportive of your precious founder. The other question I have been asking myself is regarding the SJobs retreats. They definitely happened during the Macintosh era but were they used during the second era. My impression is that they created a toxicity. It makes sense that CEO of large organization will hear names through the grapevine and want to get direct input. I see the founder to be idiosyncratic and there is alway tension be that a desire for consistent environment. I think a good founder is able to compartmentalize the idiosyncratic from the supportive resource mechanics were humans like consistency. No doubt SJobs was in Founder mode when he had all the CNCs at NeXT painted black and distorting the machine's tolerances.