6 ms·
Maybe there was no need to do so because they banned the accounts themselves. They even banned the acting president's account. https://blog.x.com/en_us/topics/
by petre 2y ago
Maybe there was no need to do so because they banned the accounts themselves. They even banned the acting president's account.
https://blog.x.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/suspension https://blog.x.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/suspension
- 23B1 2y agoYes, in the U.S. the obedient capitalists act as proxy censors for the government, in exchange for campaign donations, preferential tax treatment, and weak regulatory enforcement.
- petre 2y agoProxy censors for the gov't? The US president represents the government, yet the company banned him. Their shareholders don't want controversies screwing up their investment, so the management acted accordingly in the company's best interest.