2 ms·
There also won't be any discussion of replacing the C-suite with LLM assistants at a fraction of the cost - the compute cost must be less than all the 8-figure
by photochemsyn 2y ago
There also won't be any discussion of replacing the C-suite with LLM assistants at a fraction of the cost - the compute cost must be less than all the 8-figure yearly payouts. Maybe LLM assitants would also be vastly more reliable managers of pension funds, too? I'd be surprised to hear a word mentioned about that.
- tbrownaw 2y ago> There also won't be any discussion of replacing the C-suite with LLM assistants at a fraction of the cost - the compute cost must be less than all the 8-figure yearly payouts. Well, what's her show like? Covering why popular but terrible ideas are terrible is a thing, but I have no idea if it's her sort of thing. > Maybe LLM assitants would also be vastly more reliable managers of pension funds, too? I'd be surprised to hear a word mentioned about that. Various forms of passive fund are already a thing, and AIUI do approximately as well as most actively managed funds. From what I understand, things unique to pension funds are that they tend to have too little money put into them in the first place, and that they have regulatory constraints about sticking to safe (and therefore lower-performing) investments.