4 ms·
Out of curiosity, what caused the error in the article? I was wondering if you derived the number via a similar calculation as above (a full 747), it's a direc
by reitzensteinm 14y ago
Out of curiosity, what caused the error in the article?
I was wondering if you derived the number via a similar calculation as above (a full 747), it's a direct reference to the size of the hard drive it's carrying, or just a simple typo?
- jgrahamc 14y agoIt was an editing error. I originally had a whole paragraph imagining a continuous line of 747s containing 1TB disks and was going to be making an analogy about the connection across the Internet, but it was too complicated. In editing that out I didn't go back to the right number.