3 ms·
Does Bluesky intend to be responsive to the kind of court orders that X rejected?
by delichon 2y ago
Does Bluesky intend to be responsive to the kind of court orders that X rejected?
- mwilcox 2y agoClearly given he is excited to receive the traffic
- meiraleal 2y agoInterestingly, the cohort moving to Bluesky isn't the same as those who were having trouble with the law.
- siproprio 2y agoYes. Brazilians were censored and moved to bluesky. Elon musk has problems with the law! Absolutely no overlap whatsoever. Also very interesting in its own way.
- jrflowers 2y agoCan you elaborate on this? I’m not clear what you mean here.
- pfraze 2y agoSpeaking entirely personally as I don't handle those questions at bsky. I couldn't even begin to comment without seeing knowing what the court orders were and what the cases are. Every social company operating internationally runs into this issue, and it's daunting to say the least. So, again, this is not something I decide. What I can say is that the protocol is a neutral global layer for data, which can then enable multiple applications with their own moderation policies and decisions. There's always going to be moderation decisions we make that people will disagree with. The point is that something can be done about that disagreement - you can have other applications on the same network that makes their own decisions. I think one of the best things that could happen is that Brazilian developers fork the Bluesky app and build locally-owned social platforms on the atmosphere.
- Kye 2y agoContext: atmosphere is like "Fediverse" but for the AT protocol and also way more schway
- chrisweekly 2y agoI had to check, and urbandictionary confirms, "schway" is > "A word to use when something is astonishingly cool, fashionable, or popular."
- Kye 2y agoI got it from Batman Beyond.
- throwaway48476 2y ago>Brazilian developers fork the Bluesky app and build locally-owned social platforms on the atmosphere. This makes it easy to send thugs to their house and 'encourage' them to comply with any political demand. Jurisdictional arbitrage, particularly sites hosted in America following the first amendment is the only thing keeping anti authoritarian speech alive in authoritarian regimes. https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/audio-pakistan-global-critics https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/audio-pakistan-global-critics
- otabdeveloper4 2y ago[flagged]
- brightball 2y agoX has just started sharing all of them in response. https://x.com/alexandrefiles/status/1829979981130416479?s=46&t=alZCBpHQmrOiijvY9w8DwA https://x.com/alexandrefiles/status/1829979981130416479?s=46...
- antimemetics 2y agoRather someone on Twitter shared some text - these aren’t the original court orders - they are at best a paraphrase by someone with a certain agenda.
- mensetmanusman 2y agoNo, it is a game of whack a mole.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- crossroadsguy 2y agoSomething tells me at the least bsky will not begin a name calling primary school attack with a supreme court justice of a sovereign nation while using abusive names for the president of that country all the while using childish fake AI generated graphics. PS. Somehow all of this feels very natural when done by Musk. It kind of makes sense. It feels like “yes yes, he’d do this”.
- rapsey 2y agoA supreme court judge clearly acting against the laws of their state, but somehow Musk is the bad guy.
- bilvar 2y agoWe arrived at the point that people are celebrating censorship and authoritarianism because of their irrational hatred of one guy.
- Ygg2 2y agoThat's how it always works. "You see the problem with not dealing with XYZ is that the government/judicial/legislative doesn't have enough power to tackle XYZ." You grant them power they asked. They don't deal with it, but ask for more power. At some point they stop asking and label you as the problem.
- rapsey 2y ago[flagged]