3 ms·
I'd like to see that too, but time and time again we've seen that: a) laypeople aren't usually moved by privacy violations more abstract than someone physicall
by chefandy 2y ago
I'd like to see that too, but time and time again we've seen that:
a) laypeople aren't usually moved by privacy violations more abstract than someone physically watching you do something.
b) most people aren't willing to don practical accessories that noticably change the perception of your face unless it emphasizes qualities considered sexy.
c) safety gear generally isn't considered sexy
I think that this stuff would be perceived like wearing a physical bike helmet for your data privacy with all the cachet of Google Glass.
- lisper 2y ago> most people aren't willing to don practical accessories that noticably change the perception of your face unless it emphasizes qualities considered sexy. Ironic related story in the news: https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2024/08/29/passport-photos-makeup-security-tiktok/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2024/08/29/passport-ph...
- TeMPOraL 2y agoAlso d) it's easier to update face recognition ML to see through the latest in camouflage fashion than to design, manufacture and sell new clothes after each update to the ML model. Especially that they need to keep fooling previous versions of the model too.