3 ms·
Call me a skeptic but this whole charade about privacy aware infrastructure seems more likely to be about plausible deniability rather than genuine compliance.
by refibrillator 2y ago
Call me a skeptic but this whole charade about privacy aware infrastructure seems more likely to be about plausible deniability rather than genuine compliance.
If it’s truly such a complex and monumental effort for a global company like Meta to adhere to these standards, how the hell does the EU plan to detect non-compliance?
Many of us here are keenly aware how easily private data can be laundered through ML models, obfuscating provenance beyond reversibility.
Incentivizing whistleblowers by sharing a % of the fine could be a good start, but as far as I’m aware no such provision exists under the EU DMA regulation.
- xvector 2y ago> Call me a skeptic but this whole charade about privacy aware infrastructure seems more likely to be about plausible deniability rather than genuine compliance. It actually is that difficult. I have worked at a few big tech companies now on these projects and it would be insane to expect a startup to do something similar. I do not think these regulations were crafted with any semblance of care for feasibility or implementation burden. > If it’s truly such a complex and monumental effort for a global company like Meta to adhere to these standards, how the hell does the EU plan to detect non-compliance? These sort of regulations are often enforced by demanding internal audits. Most of the evidence used against Meta in fines has actually been disclosed by Meta.