4 ms·

looks like you need to pay to use this "free open source lib" https://github.com/mljar/supertree/blob/main/supertree-commercial-license.pdf https://github.com/

• zahlman 2y ago
  There are separate commercial and non-commercial licenses listed in the repository. This may not be compatible with open source, but it's a reasonable licensing strategy overall and doesn't create a "need to pay" as most use would be non-commercial. Creative Commons licenses are not designed for software, but they clearly encode this sort of provision for other creative works. Why shouldn't software developers follow a similar path? I don't know where you're quoting "free open source lib" from. It's not in the OP nor in the project README as far as I can tell. In fact, the README explicitly calls it commercial software.
  • pplonski86 2y ago
    Thank you. You are right, the software is free for evaluation and personal use. For commercial use, you need to buy license. We would like to make this package sustainable :) There are a lot of open source packages that developers can't further develop and maintain because lack of funding.