3 ms·
You can argue what exactly is and isn't a reasonable expectation of privacy, and someone else can argue differently. For example, the upskirt "street photograp
by neilv 2y ago
You can argue what exactly is and isn't a reasonable expectation of privacy, and someone else can argue differently.
For example, the upskirt "street photographers" have long argued one way, and eventually they get smacked down, legally.
- SkyPuncher 2y agoIt’s hard to take your argument serious when you choose a pretty absurd example. You walk around the street with a pair of eyes on your face, but that doesn’t mean you can just bend over and look up people’s clothing. The law clearly establishes a difference between capturing “normal” content in public and invading privacy.
- neilv 2y agoDo the privacy laws regarding public surveillance speak of "content"? Because that sounds like something a techbro smug halfwit would say.
- SkyPuncher 2y agoYes, and in California, where this article is based, there are explicit laws against this.
- gruez 2y ago>You can argue what exactly is and isn't a reasonable expectation of privacy, and someone else can argue differently. No. The guy you're replying to isn't giving his opinion on whether it should be allowed or not, he's stating how the law works right now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expectation_of_privacy_(United_States) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expectation_of_privacy_(United...