4 ms·
Do you have an actual argument to refute him with? Or just appeals to authority? Baseless appeals at that, given that these judge-kings are in their position b
by matheusmoreira 2y ago
Do you have an actual argument to refute him with? Or just appeals to authority?
Baseless appeals at that, given that these judge-kings are in their position by political appointment, not by being tested and filtered by concurso público like the real judges in this country.
- diego_moita 2y ago> Do you have an actual argument to refute him with? Of course not. And I don't need to provide any, since there isn't anything here to "refute". After all, he also didn't provide any argument to demonstrate that the decision was illegal. He just took an opinion out of his ass. His thesis was unsubstantiated from the start. This is a moot discussion.
- diegoholiveira 2y ago[flagged]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- matheusmoreira 2y agoHere are the arguments for why what the judge is doing is illegal: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39966382 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39966382
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- diegoholiveira 2y agodiego_moita does not care about an argument. I show him an argument from the retired minister of the Supreme Court and he says: “this is old news”, ignoring that the current process is the same since 2019. My opinion: he agree with the decision knowing that it’s destroying our legal system. You have people on right and left saying this (the brave ones, unfortunately it’s just few people that have courage to criticize the Supreme Court). That’s ok. Brazil always fail in have solid institutions since 1889. And he is ok with that.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]