3 ms·

So you agree with OP. Just say it’s to stop Russia.

• aguaviva 2y ago
  The point here is -- it's not like the threat from Russia isn't (unlike the hypothetical threat from terrorists) entirely real.
  • aaomidi 2y ago
    Threat from terrorist isn’t real? All of these are real threats. Even the CSAM arguments have a grain of truth to it. What changes overtime is people’s relationship to these threats and their perception of what mitigating factors are actually going to be effective
• sevnin 2y ago
  No I disagree, what are you even refering to? What are these particular actions?, curiously we never refer to russian actions as anti-ukrainian, anti-polish, anti-european. Its always the other way round.
  • aaomidi 2y ago
    I think you should go read the comment chain again. The person was saying that you can use a “Russia” line to get the population to agree to a measure or chat control. You just went in and basically proved their point.
    • sevnin 2y ago
      If he worded it like you did now "Russian line", I would agree--but he didnt. He used a word that Russia loves to use in cry bully situations. It implies that Lithuanians are doing this because they just happen to hate poor russians while they have legitimate reasons to be scared and are forced to react. You may think that Im pedantic or whatever but Russia has history of subtly playing with words and thus dictating the discourse. For example term eastern europe was hijacked by soviets to enshrine and justify their sphere of influence which was a completely made up term which descends from germans and their ostsiedlung--the settling of lands to the east of germans states by germans.