6 ms·
Meta: dang here is incorrect. Each post could be the first time someone is encountering a Wolfram post. If they haven't built up defenses to this kind of self
by iandanforth 2y ago
Meta: dang here is incorrect.
Each post could be the first time someone is encountering a Wolfram post. If they haven't built up defenses to this kind of self aggrandizement they might believe his words. This, and every piece from him deserves a community note.
Just because you've seen a lot of misinformation from a source in the past is no excuse to stop labeling it as such.
- blablabla123 2y agoComing from Physics the first time I heard detailed information about Mathematica (in contrast to Maple) and the Physics related work from a Professor it was also accompanied with a huge disclaimer. Reflecting further on this, a lot of this is very niche and seems to be not explored fully in the spirit of peer review
- dooglius 2y agodang posted a link at the top to such information for those who are unfamiliar, which serves as the note you want without detracting from other discussion