2 ms·
> and neglect any other human walking by this back alley Not just the back alley. The back alley itself has nothing specifically to do with it. The test would
by jmull 2y ago
> and neglect any other human walking by this back alley
Not just the back alley. The back alley itself has nothing specifically to do with it. The test would have to be something like the crow attacks this person but not anyone else around the building generally. That doesn't really make a lot of sense from the crows perspective either though... it's concerned with the plight of its mate, so why focus instead on a random person who's a decent distance away unless it can perceive a specific connection, e.g., by recognizing them.
It's moot anyway. I think it's pretty well established crows can recognize human faces.
- natmaka 2y ago> Not just the back alley The idea is that we already are sure they attack there, and therefore limiting the experiment to this back alley may be sufficient: there is no immediate need to extend the perimeter to the whole zone around building, however if the experiment fails it may be considered. > it's pretty well established IMHO an experiment gets better with each neglected assumption.