It’s pretty easy to understand. The syntax is similar and it uses a lot of the same patterns, but it’s a lot lighter weight. Glad you love Rust, but it is not

It’s pretty easy to understand. The syntax is similar and it uses a lot of the same patterns, but it’s a lot lighter weight. Glad you love Rust, but it is not remotely straightforward or “boring” — there’s a lot of hidden magic behind idiomatic Rust. And I wouldn’t call it “astonishingly good” for many of the use cases you mention. It can do all those things, but often not easily.