3 ms·
Thank you for the responce but the article is about warning which obviously is a part of X's censourship but this is innocent because real censourship is about
by eimrine 2y ago
Thank you for the responce but the article is about warning which obviously is a part of X's censourship but this is innocent because real censourship is about deleting/lowering in search/shadowbanning/messing with paying advertizers - deplatforming in one word. Warning is that kind of censourship which is happening inside of speaker's head, this is more like a self-censourship because the person thinks whether he/she should use the specific word in the world of euphemisms. The real censourship is whether deplatforming happens or not. It may happen with or without warning, also deplatforming may not happen after the warn and this is why I consider your example as something innocent.
- Hikikomori 2y agoWarning? Messages containing that is removed, is that not censorship? Did you consider that advertisers are leaving because they don't want their ads next to right wing extremist and nazis spewing their shit?
- eimrine 2y agoI don't believe those messages are really removed for users from any country by the fact of having the word in your tweet, just use 1337 wording if the warning bothers you. Advertizers which don't want their ads next to right wing content should really prefer seing their ads next to left wing extremism elsewhere. Nazis are really a different talk, they are not even the right wing.