I’m pretty sure I didn’t misunderstand the parent comment. I just didn’t choose to address only that comment in my reply — I spun my reply in the context of al

I’m pretty sure I didn’t misunderstand the parent comment. I just didn’t choose to address only that comment in my reply — I spun my reply in the context of all of the previous discussions about Sec230 reform — because that’s the underlying worry that I have. I could care less if the biggest social media companies die off, but I _do_ worry about all of the other unintended consequences of this ruling (more accurately, changing the definition of “speech” to include something that is so far removed from direct and intentional).