Unfortunately it's how those with less technological knowledge help the government to place restrictions on freedom, because there is a disconnect with reportin

Unfortunately it's how those with less technological knowledge help the government to place restrictions on freedom, because there is a disconnect with reporting accurate news and making a name for yourself. Walled gardens are easier to police (although often allowing more sinister things through than standard websites), and the public is becoming more and more aligned with social media being "the internet" similar to how AOL was setup in the 90's. Those of us that were around in that time period saw how much more was possible outside of these walled gardens, and I believe even those that weren't around in those days that have any tech-literacy are able to see the benefit to being able to exist outside of social media. There is always going to be some kind of crusade in the name of something that tugs at everyone's heartstrings, but it's only to chip away at the freedoms of those that don't partake in the terrible acts (which there's no doubt terrible acts do occur, but not enough to have us all give up our freedom to make it easier to stop). I hope it's clear that I agree with you, and it is scary how easily swayed the public is (and that's coming from a father that definitely wants protections for our children, but also understand that a lot of that needs to start at home with communication more than limiting technology).