6 ms·
Arguably, Tcl can do GUIs much easily and can integrate C less awkwardly than Perl. Both have their use cases, at any rate, and more people should use Tcl, Perl
by overanalytcl 2y ago
Arguably, Tcl can do GUIs much easily and can integrate C less awkwardly than Perl. Both have their use cases, at any rate, and more people should use Tcl, Perl and any version of Expect. Nowadays it falls into the category of tools that were once somewhat used, but now are obscure, like fold/fmt, nl, comm and pr.
- thesuperbigfrog 2y ago>> Arguably, Tcl can do GUIs much easily and can integrate C less awkwardly than Perl. We used Perl/Tk for GUIs on that old system. It brimgs the ease of Tk GUIs to Perl: https://metacpan.org/dist/Tk/view/pod/UserGuide.pod https://metacpan.org/dist/Tk/view/pod/UserGuide.pod >> Nowadays it falls into the category of tools that were once somewhat used, but now are obscure To be sure, but a lot of it still works without changes!
- kevin_thibedeau 2y agoPerl/Tk has always been a red headed stepchild since it is a fork attempting to implement a C API that doesn't require Tcl to be linked. Because of that, it has long missed out on significant improvements to Tk over the years. Python Tkinter avoids that by just wrapping around a Tcl interpreter.