I think it's a difference of scale. If rando small business or rando dude is just using FOSS software without giving back, whatever people have priorities. If

I think it's a difference of scale. If rando small business or rando dude is just using FOSS software without giving back, whatever people have priorities. If megacorp is re-boxing it in a closed source manner and making mass profits off of it without dedicating at least some level of engineering hours or money to the project, that's a dick move. Being unhappy with that situation is totally fine and it's understandable to change the licensing to a more copyleft license to reflect your intents. That's what elastic did. They essentially went Apache-2.0 -> ... -> AGPLv3 but it took a while for them to figure it out. And my complaint isn't that people make money off FOSS software or don't give back enough. It's that they make money off FOSS software and don't give back essentially at all while depriving their users of the same rights/licensing terms that the upstream gave them.