> You are going to have to try again... I guess I'm just not sure what I'm supposed to be "trying"? What point to you think he was making by pointing out this

> You are going to have to try again... I guess I'm just not sure what I'm supposed to be "trying"? What point to you think he was making by pointing out this fact (to use your words)? > They already can't, and they already don't. A did a Google search for "estimations for number of non-citizens that vote" from my US IP address. I've cherry picked the one that is in Mike's favor (claiming 10% to 27% of votes): https://www.justfacts.com/news_non-citizen_voter_registration https://www.justfacts.com/news_non-citizen_voter_registratio... And a good one in your favor (claiming 0.0001% of votes): https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/noncitizen-voting-already-illegal-and-vanishingly-rare https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/nonc... --- So I don't know what is really going on, but I do enjoy reading and trying to better understand these complex topics, but I don't want to debate you on this, from either side. If you are really just itching to debate on this topic, you should ask ChatGPT to do that with you; I've responded enough on here that you can probably get it to reply in my style of writing and pretend it's me, if you really wanted (I'd actually love to _read_ the debate if you actually do this!). --- Aside: I found a website that attempts to give a "Bias Rating" to publishers: https://www.allsides.com/news-source/just-facts-media-bias https://www.allsides.com/news-source/just-facts-media-bias https://www.allsides.com/news-source/brennan-center-justice-media-bias https://www.allsides.com/news-source/brennan-center-justice-... This website is obviously not going to be foolproof, and probably even has some bias itself in its ratings. I'm not suggesting these "Bias Ratings" have any bearing on the legitimacy of the studies above, I just found it interesting so I thought I'd share it with you.