2 ms·
> You aren't even using the term Zionism correctly. Many active zionists use the term this way, and not in the way you do. Secular Zionism of Hertzl was indeed
by golergka 2y ago
> You aren't even using the term Zionism correctly.
Many active zionists use the term this way, and not in the way you do. Secular Zionism of Hertzl was indeed more prominent, but already in 1902, Mizrahi organisation already saw a completely different concept of zionism, which didn't identify itself with European nation-state nationalism of 19th century. Ironically, both of these views are still Ashkenazi inventions. But most of israelis are not Ashkenazi, but Mizrahim. Role of Jerusalem in these communities, desire to live in historical Israel and restoration of Jewish state of Palestine is something which is completely forgotten.
And while zionism as state-building was not the focus of the jews, zionism as resettling to Israel was always a thing. My own family has been dispersed after expultion from Spain, and while most moved to Italy, some people (I forget the name) decided to move to Jerusalem instead. There always were sizable Jewish communities in the area, and immigrating there was a decision that people did take sometimes.
- aguaviva 2y agoInteresting context for sure, but I was referring to mainstream usage of the term, of course. In any case, the main point here is that US meddling in the region certainly didn't start with the first arms transfers in the 1960s.