3 ms·
The only real downside to a single landowner vs a national park is that nobody else gets to enjoy the beauty of the area. - A hiker
by GigabyteCoin 14y ago
The only real downside to a single landowner vs a national park is that nobody else gets to enjoy the beauty of the area.
- A hiker
- protomyth 14y agoThere is quite a bit of national park areas that do not allow humans, many in the pacific.
- tomsaffell 14y agoI didn't know that. Where? Please post links.
- brandnewlow 14y agoCongrats! What are you doing on HN? :)
- acheron 14y agoStart here. http://www.papahanaumokuakea.gov/about/welcome.html http://www.papahanaumokuakea.gov/about/welcome.html You can get a "recreation permit" for one small part of the area (Midway Atoll), so the entire area is not closed off, but for the most part it's all "protected". There are more, but I assume you know how to use Google?
- GigabyteCoin 14y agoTrue, but nobody really lives within proximity of them to have any reason to open them up to the public. If they did, it would probably become poacher central because nobody would be there to stop them. (Come to think of it, maybe it is like that right now, who knows?)