3 ms·
I was going off 100 gallons per day per person, which is typical, but can obviously be improved upon. But that said, I don’t want to pay $7000 per year just for
by gcanyon 2y ago
I was going off 100 gallons per day per person, which is typical, but can obviously be improved upon. But that said, I don’t want to pay $7000 per year just for water. Plus living remotely like that is just terribly inefficient in general: food, trash, heating/cooling, transportation, water, and just everything all take much more effort/resources to produce in a solo venture like that. I’m not saying I don’t see the appeal, but the Earth could not (even remotely) support everyone living that way.
- jonstewart 2y agoNet zero living looks a lot more like the Upper West Side than a cabin in the woods.
- gcanyon 2y agoThere's a reason NY is near the lowest per capita energy consumption for residential usage.