3 ms·
Re: Edit The top level categorizations are indeed fixed, however the nodes themselves can be arbitrary. We've found this helps with grouping and organization
by WillMcCall 2y ago
Re: Edit
The top level categorizations are indeed fixed, however the nodes themselves can be arbitrary. We've found this helps with grouping and organization while still allowing for the flexibility required to accommodate different systems. I'm curious, are there any categories missing here that could be added?
Currently, we categorize by: Frontend (UI/UX elements), Backend (API/Business/Data Access), DB(persisting storage), External Services (Backends maintained outside codebase), Shared Components (internally maintained libraries and helpers)
- zingar 2y agoI don’t think I’d draw a diagram by hand with an explicit “frontend” label, I think I’d most likely leave it without a label. If I had to choose I would leave it labeled as “UI”.
- WillMcCall 2y agoThat makes sense, we'll make this change!