This is only a circuit court ruling - there is a good chance it will be overturned by the supreme court. The cited supreme court case (Moody v. NetChoice) does

This is only a circuit court ruling - there is a good chance it will be overturned by the supreme court. The cited supreme court case (Moody v. NetChoice) does not require personalization: > presenting a curated and “edited compilation of [third party] speech” is itself protected speech. This circuit court case mentions the personalization but doesn't limit its judgment based on its presence - almost any type of curation other than the kind of moderation explicitly exempted by the CDA could create liability, though in practice I don't think "sorting by upvotes with some decay" would end up qualifying.