5 ms·
It shouldn't be auditable by anyone. There should be an audit trail though, and it should be available to the subject of that process on request.
by giantg2 2y ago
It shouldn't be auditable by anyone. There should be an audit trail though, and it should be available to the subject of that process on request.
- OutOfHere 2y agoThat would be something, but the issue is that most people don't have the time or capacity to audit their own records, or to hire an attorney to escalate it. Journalists on the other hand specialize in this; they can audit everyone's records and expose wrongdoing at a state level.
- giantg2 2y agoA simple request for the audit record is absolutely something that consumers should be able to do. There's no guarantee that journalist is going to look at your record to get you help. It won't help in edge cases and those people will still be screwed.
- OutOfHere 2y ago> There's no guarantee that journalist is going to look at your record The journalists look at aggregates first, and then individuals help tell the story. The point is that both individual-audit-records and full data+logic exports serve their unique purpose. Anyone should be able to use the data+logic to replay the execution, whether for oneself or for the entire community.
- giantg2 2y ago"Anyone should be able to use the data+logic to replay the execution, whether for oneself or for the entire community." No. You can't guarantee anonymity. If you want to have someone audit them, use the GAO or similar.