3 ms·

This is not an organic use of an altered meaning. The term is imposed by huge corporations who force it on their developers and everyone who wants to get fundin

• JumpCrisscross 2y ago
  > an organic use of an altered meaning. The term is imposed by huge corporations who force it LLMs were entirely proprietary. In that context, Facebook put forward a foundational model one can run on their own hardware and called it open. At the time, nobody had defined what an open-source LLM was. People came out to say Llama wasn't open. But nobody rigorously proposed a practical definition. The OSI has started, but they're being honest about it being a draft. In the meantime, people are organically discussing open versus proprietary models in a variety of contexts, most of which aren't particularly concerned with the OSI's definitions.